DANILOV & WYNN

In the matter of *Danilov & Wynn*, heard before Baumann J, the husband sought an order to restrain Mr Phillip Cooke from acting as legal representative for the wife in the proceedings.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether Mr Cooke should be prevented from continuing to act for the wife, presumably due to a conflict of interest or other professional impropriety.

Baumann J dismissed the husband's application. While the reasons for dismissal are not detailed in the provided text, the Court's decision indicates that the husband did not establish sufficient grounds to warrant the restraint of Mr Cooke's representation. The Court also made orders regarding the potential for the wife to pursue costs against the husband in respect of a discrete hearing conducted on 19 June 2020, outlining a process for written submissions and determination on the papers.