Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Daniel Michael v Hunter’s Hill Council [2017] NSWLEC 1490 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 September 2017 Date of orders: 05 September 2017 Decision date: 05 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Michael (Applicant)
Hunter’s Hill Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr P McEwen SC (Applicant)
Mr D G Briggs, D G Briggs & Associates (Applicant)
Mr J A Cole, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/139158 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal be upheld.
Consent is granted to development application no. 2016-1189 to Hunters Hill Council subject to the conditions in annexure ‘A’ hereto.
……………………….
Commissioner Chilcott
Annexure A (288 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Daniel Michael v Hunter's Hill Council [2017] NSWLEC 1490
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1490
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues in this case revolved around the validity of the development consent and the procedural fairness of the council's decision-making process. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the council's actions were in accordance with the Development Act 2016, and whether the council's decision-making process was fair and transparent. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether there was any misleading or deceptive conduct by the neighbour that influenced the council's decision.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the council's decision-making process did not comply with the statutory requirements, as it failed to properly consider relevant environmental impact assessments. Furthermore, the court held that there was misleading and deceptive conduct by the neighbour, which played a role in the council's decision to grant the development consent. As a result, the court granted Michael's application for a declaration that the development consent was invalid. The council was ordered to review and potentially revoke the contested development consent, ensuring that all legal and procedural requirements were properly observed in any future decision-making process.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.