DAMBROSE & PACETTI

In *Dambrose & Pacetti*, heard before Newbrun J, the dispute concerned interim parenting orders. The application before the court sought to establish arrangements for the children pending final determination of parenting proceedings.

The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the best interests of the child in the context of interim parenting orders. This required the court to consider the relevant factors under the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) and to balance the competing claims and needs of the parties and the children.

Newbrun J applied the principles governing interim parenting orders, emphasising that such orders are temporary and should be made with a view to maintaining the status quo where possible, unless there are compelling reasons to depart from it. The court considered evidence relating to the children's welfare, including their relationships with each parent and any potential risks. The paramount consideration remained the best interests of the children, which guided the court's assessment of the appropriate interim arrangements.

The court made specific interim orders regarding the children's living arrangements and time spent with each parent, designed to promote their welfare and stability during the ongoing proceedings.