| [2023] FWC 1458 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Dalyn Stockdale
v
Stephen Gillespie Infinite Care
(U2023/4243)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2023 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy
On 16 May 2023 Ms Dalyn Stockdale made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The application was incomplete in that Ms Stockdale did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.
On 22 May 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Ms Stockdale’s nominated email address advising that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed. An SMS notification was also sent to Ms Stockdale’s nominated telephone number advising of the requirement to action the payment request email from the Fair Work Commission.
On 30 May 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Ms Stockdale’s nominated email address reminding that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received, the application may be dismissed.
A final attempt to contact Ms Stockdale on her nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 31 May 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call went unanswered and there were no voicemail facility.
The applicant’s mother contacted the Commission’s helpline on the 13 June 2023, querying if Ms Stockdale could pay the lodgement fee when she is paid next week. The Commission advised Ms Stockdale of the time frame to pay the lodgement fee and provided information about the waiver form.
To date there has been no response from Ms Stockdale, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.
Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR763363>
- AGLC
- Dalyn Stockdale v Stephen Gillespie Infinite Care [2023] FWC 1458
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1458
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether Stockdale's application complied with the FW Act's requirements for fee submission or waiver form completion. Section 395 of the FW Act mandates that an application to the FWC must be accompanied by a prescribed fee, with potential for fee waivers under certain circumstances. Section 587(1) of the FW Act authorises the FWC to dismiss applications that are not made in accordance with the Act. Commissioner Bissett found that Stockdale's application did not meet the statutory requirements as the prescribed fee was not paid, leading to the dismissal of the application under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
Commissioner Bissett dismissed Stockdale’s application for unfair dismissal remedy, finding it was not made in accordance with the FW Act due to the absence of the required fee or a completed waiver form. The application was dismissed pursuant to section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.