[2004] QCA 158
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
Appeal No 2332 of 2004
| CHRISTINE SUSAN DALRYMPLE | Applicant |
| and | |
| GRAHAM BARTON-ANCLIFFE | Respondent |
BRISBANE
..DATE 07/05/2004
JUDGMENT
MS L LEONG (of McDonald & Leong) for the appellant via telephone link
No appearance by or on behalf of the respondent
THE PRESIDENT: The appeal in this matter is struck out.
-----
Details
- AGLC
- Dalrymple v Ancliffe [2004] QCA 158
- Case
- [2004] QCA 158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Dalrymple v Ancliffe is a case that reached the Court of Appeal in Queensland. Christine Susan Dalrymple, the applicant, sought to appeal a decision against her in a legal matter involving Graham Barton-Ancliffe, the respondent. The appeal was ultimately struck out by the court. The nature of the original dispute between the parties is not detailed in the summary provided, but it resulted in a decision that the applicant sought to challenge through this appeal.
The legal issues the court was required to decide in this appeal related to the validity and merits of striking out the appeal. The court considered whether the appeal had any reasonable prospect of success and whether there were any grounds upon which the appeal could proceed. The absence of legal representation for the respondent may have also influenced the court's decision-making process.
The court's reasoning, as evidenced by the brief summary, indicates that the appeal was struck out, likely due to the absence of any legal representation for the respondent and potentially a lack of grounds for the appeal to proceed. The court found that the appeal did not have a reasonable prospect of success and therefore decided to dismiss it. This outcome suggests that the court did not find the appeal to be sufficiently meritorious or well-founded to warrant further consideration.
The legal issues the court was required to decide in this appeal related to the validity and merits of striking out the appeal. The court considered whether the appeal had any reasonable prospect of success and whether there were any grounds upon which the appeal could proceed. The absence of legal representation for the respondent may have also influenced the court's decision-making process.
The court's reasoning, as evidenced by the brief summary, indicates that the appeal was struck out, likely due to the absence of any legal representation for the respondent and potentially a lack of grounds for the appeal to proceed. The court found that the appeal did not have a reasonable prospect of success and therefore decided to dismiss it. This outcome suggests that the court did not find the appeal to be sufficiently meritorious or well-founded to warrant further consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.