Daban and Jeffby (No 2)

Case

[2013] FamCA 960

17 September 2013


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Daban and Jeffby (No 2) [2013] FamCA 960 [2013] FamCA 960 17 September 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Daban and Jeffby (No 2), Aldridge J of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered a dispute concerning parental responsibility for a child. The proceedings were conducted on an undefended basis, with the applicant mother seeking specific orders regarding the child's living arrangements and contact with the respondent father and other family members.

The court was required to determine the appropriate orders for parental responsibility, the child's residence, and the extent of any time the child might spend with the respondent father. Furthermore, the court had to consider whether to grant leave for legal representatives to inspect subpoena material produced by NSW Police and to make final determinations on all outstanding applications and cross-applications before the court.

Aldridge J reasoned that the applicant mother should have sole parental responsibility for the child, and that the child should live with the mother. The court ordered that the child shall spend no time with the respondent father and shall not be in the company of specific paternal relatives, namely Ms J Jeffby (paternal aunt), Ms J Jeffby’s Partner, Ms C Jeffby (paternal grandmother), and Mr R Jeffby (paternal grandfather). Leave was granted for legal representatives to inspect subpoena material produced by NSW Police.

Consequently, all applications and cross-applications were dismissed, and all issues were removed from the Active Pending Cases List. The court also ordered that all subpoenaed material and exhibits be returned to their original custodians no earlier than fifty-six days from the date of the orders.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Discovery

  • Costs

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Dundas & Blake [2013] FamCAFC 133