D Attorneys and Sresbodan
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 404
•8 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
D Attorneys and Sresbodan [2017] FamCA 404
[2017] FamCA 404
8 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Aldridge J of the Supreme Court of Victoria was required to assess the itemised costs account filed by D Attorneys. The specific nature of the underlying dispute that led to this costs assessment is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the Court was the assessment of the itemised costs account submitted by D Attorneys. This involves a determination of the reasonableness and recoverability of the costs claimed by the legal practitioners.
The Court's reasoning and the legal principles applied in this assessment are not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the order indicates that the Court proceeded to assess the costs account as filed.
The Court ordered that the itemised costs account filed by D Attorneys on 27 April 2017 be assessed.
The central legal issue before the Court was the assessment of the itemised costs account submitted by D Attorneys. This involves a determination of the reasonableness and recoverability of the costs claimed by the legal practitioners.
The Court's reasoning and the legal principles applied in this assessment are not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the order indicates that the Court proceeded to assess the costs account as filed.
The Court ordered that the itemised costs account filed by D Attorneys on 27 April 2017 be assessed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0