Cutter & Egerton

The matter before Cronin J involved an application by the father for an expedited hearing. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed, but it concerns family law proceedings, as indicated by the involvement of an Independent Children’s Lawyer and the reference to "defended matters" and "trial."

The court was required to determine the procedural steps necessary to bring the matter to a final hearing efficiently. This included setting timelines for the filing of amended applications and responses, evidence, and submissions, as well as appointing docketed registrars to manage the case and outlining the consequences of non-compliance with the court's directions.

Cronin J granted the father's application for an expedited hearing and made detailed orders regarding the management of the case. These orders included allocating the matter to Justice Bell for a three-day final hearing commencing on 14 April 2009, setting strict deadlines for the filing of amended pleadings and affidavits by the applicant, respondent, and the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The court also directed the electronic filing of concise orders, a list of affidavits to be read, and summaries of argument. Furthermore, the court stipulated that failure to comply with these orders could result in the case being struck out, referred for further directions, or potentially proceeding on an undefended basis. The parties were also advised to monitor the progress of the defended list as their allocated place might change.