[2013] FWCA 9729 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
CTX Corporate Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/11414)
CTX CORPORATE SERVICES PTY LIMITED SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 11 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the CTX Corporate Services Pty Limited Single Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CTX Corporate Services Pty Limited Single Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CTX Corporate Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Fair Work Commission received correspondence dated 3 December 2013, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Director, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 December 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Undertaking
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405827 PR545580>
- AGLC
- CTX Corporate Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 9729
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9729
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the agreement was a "single enterprise agreement" within the meaning of the Act. The respondents argued that the agreement was not genuinely a single enterprise agreement as it was not negotiated between the employer and the employees. The applicant contended that the agreement was a genuine single enterprise agreement, negotiated between the employer and the employees' representatives. The court had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of section 173 of the Act, which sets out the criteria for a single enterprise agreement.
The court found that the agreement was a genuine single enterprise agreement as it was negotiated between the employer and the employees' representatives. The court noted that the agreement contained provisions that addressed the employees' interests and provided for the resolution of workplace disputes. The court also found that the agreement was not contrary to public policy or otherwise invalid. The court held that the agreement met the requirements of section 173 of the Act and approved the agreement.
The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court found that the agreement was a genuine single enterprise agreement and approved it. The court noted that the agreement provided for the resolution of workplace disputes and addressed the employees' interests. The court held that the agreement met the requirements of section 173 of the Act and dismissed the appeal. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the provisions of the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.