| [2015] FWCA 8628 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CSL Limited T/A CSL Limited and CSL Behring (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/7454)
CSL LIMITED CSL AGREEMENT 2015
Pharmaceutical industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 18 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the CSL Limited CSL Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CSL Limited CSL Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CSL Limited T/A CSL Limited and CSL Behring (Australia) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union, National Union of Workers and Community and Public Sector Union being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisations, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 18 December 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 December 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE417083 PR575026>
- AGLC
- CSL Limited T/A CSL Limited and CSL Behring (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 8628
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8628
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Fair Work Commission involved whether the CSL Agreement 2015 was genuinely agreed upon by the employees and whether it met the statutory requirements for approval. This included verifying if the agreement had been negotiated in good faith, if the process of consultation was adequate, and if the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not permit or authorise protected action, which is action that would be protected under the Act if it occurred.
The Fair Work Commission found that the CSL Agreement 2015 was genuinely agreed upon by the employees. The Commission considered evidence of the negotiation process and concluded that it had been conducted in good faith and with adequate consultation. The Commission also found that the agreement contained fair and reasonable terms, and that it did not permit or authorise protected action. Consequently, the Commission approved the CSL Agreement 2015 as an enterprise agreement under the Act.
The Fair Work Commission approved the CSL Agreement 2015 as an enterprise agreement. This decision allows the agreement to come into effect and bind both the employer and the employees, providing a framework for their employment terms and conditions for the specified period. The approval ensures that the agreement operates as a lawful and enforceable contract between the parties, subject to the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the approved agreement itself.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.