CSL Limited

Case [2020] FWCA 3112


[2020] FWCA 3112
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

CSL Limited
(AG2020/1510)

SEQIRUS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Pharmaceutical industry

COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL

MELBOURNE, 12 JUNE 2020

Application for approval of the Seqirus Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Seqirus Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CSL Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union and United Workers’ Union (UWU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 12 June 2020 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 July 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE508285  PR720191>

Details
AGLC
CSL Limited [2020] FWCA 3112
Case
[2020] FWCA 3112
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of CSL Limited, the Fair Work Commission was presented with an application for the approval of the Seqirus Enterprise Agreement 2020. The dispute arose between CSL Limited, a multinational biotechnology company, and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, which represented the employees of Seqirus, a subsidiary of CSL. The central issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues addressed by the Commission encompassed several key areas. First, the Commission had to determine if the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment in a fair and reasonable manner. This included scrutinising whether the proposed pay rates, hours of work, and other employment conditions were equitable for both parties. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement contained adequate provisions for dispute resolution and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements set out in the Act. The Commission also examined whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and the employees.

Upon reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission concluded that the Seqirus Enterprise Agreement 2020 was fair and reasonable. The Commission found that the proposed terms and conditions of employment were equitable and that the agreement provided sufficient mechanisms for resolving disputes. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its fairness and reasonableness for the employees of Seqirus. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence presented, ensuring that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.