CSF Industries Pty Ltd T/A CSF Industries Pty Ltd & T/A Thomas Steel Fabrication

Case [2020] FWCA 1414


[2020] FWCA 1414
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

CSF Industries Pty Ltd T/A CSF Industries Pty Ltd & T/A Thomas Steel Fabrication
(AG2020/177)

CSF INDUSTRIES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2020

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAKE

BRISBANE, 24 MARCH 2020

Application for approval of the CSF Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the CSF Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by CSF Industries Pty Ltd T/A CSF Industries Pty Ltd & T/A Thomas Steel Fabrication (the Applicant).

[2] The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[1] Mr Paul Dunbar, Industrial Relations Officer of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the CFMMEU), lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration advising that it did not support approval of the Agreement and did not wish to be covered by the Agreement.

[2] The CFMMEU advised that the CFMMEU’s rules entitle it to enrol and represent the industrial interests of employee`s in relation to the work that will be performed under this Agreement and identified several concerns with the Agreement in separate correspondence to my Chambers on 18 February 2020. The Applicant provided responses to concerns raised by both the Commission and the CFMMEU on 24 February 2020 which were sent to my Chambers and to the CFMMEU.

[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s 190, I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[4]   I observe that clause 5.2(a) of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting the NES precedence clause at clause 5.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[6] Accordingly, the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 31 March 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE507440  PR717555>

Annexure A.

Details
AGLC
CSF Industries Pty Ltd T/A CSF Industries Pty Ltd & T/A Thomas Steel Fabrication [2020] FWCA 1414
Case
[2020] FWCA 1414
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved CSF Industries Pty Ltd, trading as CSF Industries Pty Ltd and Thomas Steel Fabrication, which sought approval of the CSF Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2020. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, a tribunal with jurisdiction to oversee and approve enterprise bargaining agreements under Australian labour laws. The dispute centred around whether the proposed agreement complied with the legal requirements and whether it was fair and reasonable for the employees covered by the agreement.

The primary legal issues that the Commission needed to address included whether the bargaining agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for the proper classification of employees, and whether it included appropriate mechanisms for resolving disputes. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement met the standards of procedural fairness and whether it provided adequate protections for employees' rights and conditions.

In its decision, the Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and the content of the agreement itself. It found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that it provided for the proper classification of employees. The Commission also determined that the dispute resolution mechanisms were appropriate and that the agreement met the standards of procedural fairness. Based on these findings, the Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and approved it. The decision underscored the importance of good faith negotiation and the inclusion of adequate dispute resolution mechanisms in enterprise bargaining agreements.

The Fair Work Commission approved the CSF Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2020, affirming its compliance with legal requirements and its fairness to employees. The Commission's decision emphasised the significance of good faith negotiation and the inclusion of appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms in such agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.