| [2015] FWCA 5328 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Crystal Interior Concepts Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3427)
CRYSTAL INTERIOR CONCEPTS PTY LTD (“CRYSTAL”) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 5 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Crystal Interior Concepts Pty Ltd (“Crystal”) Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Crystal Interior Concepts Pty Ltd (“Crystal”) Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Crystal Interior Concepts Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 5 August 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 12 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415096 PR570158>
- AGLC
- Crystal Interior Concepts Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5328
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5328
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined whether the agreement provided employees with conditions that were no less favourable than those provided under the relevant award or modern award. It also considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether the process by which it was negotiated was fair. The FWC assessed the submissions from both parties and the evidence provided regarding the negotiation process, the terms of the agreement, and its potential impact on employees.
Upon reviewing the evidence and submissions, the FWC determined that the agreement did meet the BOOT and was fair in terms of the process and content. The Commission found that the negotiation process was conducted in good faith and that the agreement provided employees with terms and conditions that were no less favourable than those provided by the relevant modern award. Consequently, the FWC approved the enterprise agreement. No further orders were made beyond the approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.