Crowley & Pappas
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 783
•11 October 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Crowley & Pappas [2013] FamCA 783
[2013] FamCA 783
11 October 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Crowley & Pappas*, heard by Tree J, the primary dispute concerned the existence of a de facto relationship between the parties. The applicant sought a declaration that such a relationship had existed for a significant period.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the parties had been in a de facto relationship as defined by the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This required the court to consider the specific criteria and evidence presented to establish the nature and duration of their cohabitation and interdependence.
Tree J applied the provisions of section 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to determine the existence of the de facto relationship. The court found that the evidence supported the existence of a de facto relationship between the parties from March 1987 until 15 January 2011. Consequently, the court declared that a de facto relationship, as defined in section 4AA of the Act, existed between the parties during that period.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the parties had been in a de facto relationship as defined by the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This required the court to consider the specific criteria and evidence presented to establish the nature and duration of their cohabitation and interdependence.
Tree J applied the provisions of section 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to determine the existence of the de facto relationship. The court found that the evidence supported the existence of a de facto relationship between the parties from March 1987 until 15 January 2011. Consequently, the court declared that a de facto relationship, as defined in section 4AA of the Act, existed between the parties during that period.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Crowley & Pappas [2013] FamCA 783
Most Recent Citation
Baden & Packwood [2021] FedCFamC2F 204
Cases Citing This Decision
11
Tomson & MacLaren
[2021] FamCA 620
SAVIANE & MARRIOTT
[2014] FamCA 882
Crowley and Pappas & Anor (Costs)
[2014] FamCA 477
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
1
Jonah & White
[2011] FamCA 221
Vaughan & Bele
[2011] FamCA 436
JJR v PH
[2005] QSC 253