Crossley v Steensen

The case of Crossley v Steensen involved an attack upon the applicant, Crossley, by the respondent, Steensen. Crossley sustained injuries as a result of the attack and sought criminal compensation under the provisions of the Queensland Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1992. The dispute centred on the eligibility of Crossley to receive such compensation and the appropriate quantum. The matter was heard in the District Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant, Crossley, was entitled to claim criminal compensation under the Queensland legislation for the injuries he sustained. The court was also tasked with determining the appropriate amount of compensation, if any, that should be awarded to Crossley. The court considered statutory provisions and relevant case law to resolve these issues.

The court found that Crossley was indeed eligible to claim compensation under the statutory provisions, as the injuries were a direct result of the respondent's criminal act. The court examined the nature and extent of the injuries, as well as the impact on Crossley's life. After thorough consideration, the court determined that the appropriate amount of compensation was $22,500. The reasoning was based on the statutory framework, the principles of restitution, and the specific circumstances of the case.

Accordingly, the court ordered that the respondent, Steensen, pay to the applicant, Crossley, the sum of $22,500 by way of criminal compensation. This order was made to provide restitution to Crossley for the injuries he sustained as a result of the attack.