Cross and Cross (No. 2)
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 1095
•12 September 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cross and Cross (No. 2) [2007] FamCA 1095
[2007] FamCA 1095
12 September 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Cross and Cross (No. 2)*, the wife sought leave from Young J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to file an affidavit sworn on 7 September 2007. The precise nature of the underlying dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the application concerned the admissibility of evidence.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife should be granted leave to file her affidavit, which was sworn on 7 September 2007. This required the court to consider the rules of evidence and procedure governing the filing of affidavits, particularly in circumstances where there might be a delay or other procedural considerations.
Young J granted the wife leave to file the affidavit. The reasoning for this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the order indicates that the court was satisfied that the affidavit should be admitted into evidence. The outcome was that the wife was permitted to file her affidavit sworn on 7 September 2007.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife should be granted leave to file her affidavit, which was sworn on 7 September 2007. This required the court to consider the rules of evidence and procedure governing the filing of affidavits, particularly in circumstances where there might be a delay or other procedural considerations.
Young J granted the wife leave to file the affidavit. The reasoning for this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the order indicates that the court was satisfied that the affidavit should be admitted into evidence. The outcome was that the wife was permitted to file her affidavit sworn on 7 September 2007.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0