Croker v Challoner
Case
•
[2000] NSWCA 342
•23 November 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Croker v Challoner [2000] NSWCA 342
[2000] NSWCA 342
23 November 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal of New South Wales, comprising Mason P, Powell and Fitzgerald JJA, considered a motion to review a decision of a single judge of the Court of Appeal. The parties involved were Croker and Challoner.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the nature of a hearing to review a decision of a single judge of that court. Specifically, the Court was required to determine the threshold that must be met for such a review to be successful.
The Court of Appeal held that a review of a single judge's decision is not a fresh hearing of the appeal. Instead, the decision of the single judge must be shown to be "clearly wrong" for the review to succeed. The Court found that no question of principle arose in this instance, and therefore the motion was dismissed.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the nature of a hearing to review a decision of a single judge of that court. Specifically, the Court was required to determine the threshold that must be met for such a review to be successful.
The Court of Appeal held that a review of a single judge's decision is not a fresh hearing of the appeal. Instead, the decision of the single judge must be shown to be "clearly wrong" for the review to succeed. The Court found that no question of principle arose in this instance, and therefore the motion was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Croker v Challoner [2000] NSWCA 342
Most Recent Citation
Soden v Croker (No 2) [2016] FCA 15
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Attorney General of New South Wales v Croker
[2010] NSWSC 942
Soden v Croker (No 2)
[2016] FCA 15
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Transglobal Capital Pty Ltd v Yolarno Pty Ltd
[2004] NSWCA 136