CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Commonwealth of Australia (Represented By the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission)

Case [2023] FWC 2761


[2023] FWC 2761

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union
v

Commonwealth Of Australia (Represented By The Australian Competition And Consumer Commission)

(B2023/1131)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 23 OCTOBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission)

  1. This is an application by the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC or Employers).

  1. On 20 October 2023, the Commission was advised that the ACCC, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended.[1]  

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.  

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Kristin Barlow, Legal Officer, setting out the steps taken by the CPSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the ACCC, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote). TrueVote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[2] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 13 November 2023.[3] This also established the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR767501.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] On 20 October 2023, the Applicant filed an amended application, amending Item 3 under Question 5 of the proposed order. No objections were raised by the Respondent. Lease was granted to amend the application accordingly.

[2] TrueVote Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1446.

[3] This is, in effect, 15 working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the amended proposed order.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR767503>

Details
AGLC
CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Commonwealth of Australia (Represented By the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) [2023] FWC 2761
Case
[2023] FWC 2761
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking a protected action ballot order for employees of the Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The application was made to facilitate a ballot for potential protected action by the employees. The ACCC did not object to the application, effectively allowing the Fair Work Commission to proceed with the matter based on the submitted documents.

The primary legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the CPSU had satisfied all the statutory requirements to conduct a protected action ballot under section 443 of the Fair Work Act. This included verifying that the union had genuinely attempted to negotiate with the ACCC and that a notification period for the proposed agreement was in place. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if TrueVote Pty Ltd, the proposed ballot agent, was eligible under section 468A of the Act.

The Deputy President Hampton reviewed the declaration by Ms. Kristin Barlow, a legal officer for the CPSU, which detailed the union's efforts to negotiate with the ACCC. Based on this information, the Deputy President concluded that the CPSU had met all the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot. The declaration confirmed that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement and that the notification period for the proposed agreement was satisfied. Furthermore, the eligibility of TrueVote as a ballot agent was confirmed, and the Commission set the closing date for the ballot as 13 November 2023. This date also established the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act.

In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission granted the application for a protected action ballot order, allowing the CPSU to proceed with the ballot through TrueVote Pty Ltd. The Deputy President issued an order to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, ensuring that all bargaining representatives attend and are prepared for meaningful negotiations. The matter was assigned to another member of the Commission for further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.