CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Australian Capital Territory

Case [2023] FWC 638


[2023] FWC 638

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union
v

Australian Capital Territory

(B2023/234)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 16 MARCH 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of certain employees in the ACT Public Service covered by the ACT Public Sector Health Professional Enterprise Agreement 2021-2022

  1. This is an application by the CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Australian Capital Territory (Respondent).

  1. On 15 March 2023, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the submissions filed by the parties and the statutory declaration of Ronald Edward Johnson of the Applicant declared on 10 March 2023, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. An Order and Directions have been separately issued in PR760354 and PR760356 respectively.


VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR760355>

Details
AGLC
CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Australian Capital Territory [2023] FWC 638
Case
[2023] FWC 638
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission received an application from the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), seeking a protected action ballot order for certain employees in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) public service. The employees are covered by the ACT Public Sector Health Professional Enterprise Agreement 2021-2022. The CPSU applied under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for the ballot order. The ACT did not oppose the application, and the matter was determined on the papers without a hearing.

The central legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the CPSU had satisfied the requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the CPSU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the ACT and if the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met. The CPSU submitted that it had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement and provided a statutory declaration from Ronald Edward Johnson to support this claim.

The Fair Work Commission found that the CPSU had met the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot. The Vice President was satisfied that the CPSU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the ACT and that the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met. As a result, the application was approved, and a protected action ballot order was issued. Additionally, separate orders and directions were issued in PR760354 and PR760356.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.