| [2017] FWCA 3347 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
CPB Contractors Pty Ltd T/A CPB Contractors
(AG2017/2035)
LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS PTY LIMITED AND CFMEU SOUTH AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 21 JUNE 2017 |
Application for termination of the Leighton Contractors Pty Limited and CFMEU South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] On 5 June 2017, CPB Contractors Pty Ltd (formerly Leighton Contractors Pty Limited) made an application to terminate the Leighton Contractors Pty Limited and CFMEU South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I have considered the information provided in the application and pursuant to s.225 of the Act, I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act. Accordingly, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 21 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE889540 PR593978>
- AGLC
- CPB Contractors Pty Ltd T/A CPB Contractors [2017] FWCA 3347
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3347
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the change in membership status of CPB Contractors constituted a significant change of circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009, which would warrant the termination of the enterprise agreement. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement's termination would cause substantial injustice to the employees or other employers covered by the agreement.
In its decision, the court held that the termination of CPB Contractors' membership in the Construction, Building and Engineering Employers Association did not amount to a significant change of circumstances that would justify the termination of the enterprise agreement. The court reasoned that the agreement's continuation would not cause substantial injustice to the employees or other employers, as the terms and conditions of employment would remain unchanged. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.