Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Levitt
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 247
•26 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Levitt [2018] NSWCA 247
[2018] NSWCA 247
26 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (the Council) applied for judicial review of its own decisions concerning complaints against a solicitor, Mr Levitt. The Council had resolved that it was satisfied there was a reasonable likelihood of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal concluding Mr Levitt was guilty of professional misconduct. The central dispute concerned the proper construction and application of sections 537(2) and 540 of the *Legal Profession Act 2004* (NSW).
The legal issues before the court were whether the Council was required to consider section 540 of the Act as a condition precedent to the operation of section 537(2), and whether the Council's satisfaction of a reasonable likelihood of professional misconduct precluded it from also being satisfied of a reasonable likelihood of unsatisfactory professional conduct. The court was asked to determine if section 537(2) mandated that the Council also consider the reasonable likelihood of a finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct.
The Court of Appeal held that section 540 of the *Legal Profession Act 2004* (NSW) did not impose a condition precedent to the operation of section 537(2). It reasoned that the Council's satisfaction regarding a reasonable likelihood of professional misconduct did not preclude it from also being satisfied of a reasonable likelihood of unsatisfactory professional conduct. The court found that the wording of section 537(2) did not require the Council to consider unsatisfactory professional conduct in addition to professional misconduct.
The appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
The legal issues before the court were whether the Council was required to consider section 540 of the Act as a condition precedent to the operation of section 537(2), and whether the Council's satisfaction of a reasonable likelihood of professional misconduct precluded it from also being satisfied of a reasonable likelihood of unsatisfactory professional conduct. The court was asked to determine if section 537(2) mandated that the Council also consider the reasonable likelihood of a finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct.
The Court of Appeal held that section 540 of the *Legal Profession Act 2004* (NSW) did not impose a condition precedent to the operation of section 537(2). It reasoned that the Council's satisfaction regarding a reasonable likelihood of professional misconduct did not preclude it from also being satisfied of a reasonable likelihood of unsatisfactory professional conduct. The court found that the wording of section 537(2) did not require the Council to consider unsatisfactory professional conduct in addition to professional misconduct.
The appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Papamihail v Legal Profession Complaints Committee [No 2] [2021] WASC 346
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Health Care Complaints Commission v Hill
[2022] NSWCA 270
Taylor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales
[2020] NSWCA 273
Konstantinidis v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales
[2020] NSWCA 227
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
9
SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2017] HCA 34
CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd
[1997] HCA 2