Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Kinchington
Case
•
[2017] NSWCA 278
•31 October 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Kinchington [2017] NSWCA 278
[2017] NSWCA 278
31 October 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales applied to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales for the removal of Michael Leon Kinchington from the roll of Australian lawyers. The dispute concerned allegations of professional misconduct arising from Mr Kinchington forging a client's signature on a costs agreement and his subsequent conviction for publishing a false statement to obtain a financial advantage.
The Court was required to determine whether Mr Kinchington's conduct constituted professional misconduct, whether he was a person of good fame and character, and consequently, whether his name should be removed from the roll of Australian lawyers.
The Court found that Mr Kinchington's actions, including the forgery and the conviction, demonstrated a serious breach of his professional obligations and a lack of integrity. Applying the principles of professional responsibility and the requirements for admission and continued practice as a lawyer, the Court concluded that Mr Kinchington was not a person of good fame and character and was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll.
Accordingly, the Court declared that Mr Kinchington had been guilty of professional misconduct and was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers. The Court ordered that his name be removed from the roll and that he pay the Law Society's costs of the proceedings.
The Court was required to determine whether Mr Kinchington's conduct constituted professional misconduct, whether he was a person of good fame and character, and consequently, whether his name should be removed from the roll of Australian lawyers.
The Court found that Mr Kinchington's actions, including the forgery and the conviction, demonstrated a serious breach of his professional obligations and a lack of integrity. Applying the principles of professional responsibility and the requirements for admission and continued practice as a lawyer, the Court concluded that Mr Kinchington was not a person of good fame and character and was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll.
Accordingly, the Court declared that Mr Kinchington had been guilty of professional misconduct and was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers. The Court ordered that his name be removed from the roll and that he pay the Law Society's costs of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Standing
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Biscoe [2017] NSWCA 286
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Biscoe
[2017] NSWCA 286