Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Graham
Case
•
[2005] NSWCA 127
•25 March 2005
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Graham [2005] NSWCA 127
[2005] NSWCA 127
25 March 2005
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales appealed to the Tribunal against a decision concerning the conduct of a solicitor, Mr. Graham. The dispute centred on whether the solicitor's failure to provide a proper Accountant's Certificate for the renewal of his practising certificate constituted professional misconduct.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the solicitor's conduct, specifically the failure to comply with the administrative obligation to supply a satisfactory Accountant's Certificate, amounted to professional misconduct under the *Legal Profession Act 1987* and the *Legal Profession Regulation 2002*. The Tribunal also considered the weight to be given to the Law Society's assessment of professional misconduct.
The Tribunal reasoned that while the solicitor's failure was an administrative one and not trivial, it did not reach the level of professional misconduct. It applied the common law tests for professional misconduct, referencing *Allinson v General Council of Medical Education & Registration* and *Kennedy v The Council of the Incorporated Law Institute of New South Wales*, which require a certain gravity of conduct. The Tribunal found that the solicitor's omission, being a breach of an administrative obligation and not declared as serious misconduct under the Act, lacked the necessary gravity. English and Queensland decisions concerning similar failures were considered but deemed not to assist due to differences in legislation and facts. The Tribunal concluded that the solicitor's conduct was an administrative failure, not professional misconduct.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the solicitor's conduct, specifically the failure to comply with the administrative obligation to supply a satisfactory Accountant's Certificate, amounted to professional misconduct under the *Legal Profession Act 1987* and the *Legal Profession Regulation 2002*. The Tribunal also considered the weight to be given to the Law Society's assessment of professional misconduct.
The Tribunal reasoned that while the solicitor's failure was an administrative one and not trivial, it did not reach the level of professional misconduct. It applied the common law tests for professional misconduct, referencing *Allinson v General Council of Medical Education & Registration* and *Kennedy v The Council of the Incorporated Law Institute of New South Wales*, which require a certain gravity of conduct. The Tribunal found that the solicitor's omission, being a breach of an administrative obligation and not declared as serious misconduct under the Act, lacked the necessary gravity. English and Queensland decisions concerning similar failures were considered but deemed not to assist due to differences in legislation and facts. The Tribunal concluded that the solicitor's conduct was an administrative failure, not professional misconduct.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Breach
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
New South Wales Bar Association v Hart [2006] NSWADT 97
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Tangsilsat v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales
[2019] NSWCA 144
Law Society of New South Wales v Grech
[2006] NSWADT 73
New South Wales Bar Association v Hart
[2006] NSWADT 97
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
2
Law Society of New South Wales v Graham
[2004] NSWADT 213
Law Society of New South Wales v Cass
[2004] NSWADT 259
Law Society of NSW v Lukas
[2004] NSWADT 231