| [2019] FWCA 650 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cotton On Group Services Pty Ltd T/A Cotton On
(AG2018/5315)
COTTON ON GROUP AND NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Storage services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 5 FEBRUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Cotton On Group and National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cotton On Group and National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cotton On Group Services Pty Ltd T/A Cotton On. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 February 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501610 PR704539>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Cotton On Group Services Pty Ltd T/A Cotton On [2019] FWCA 650
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 650
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement adequately addressed the rights and obligations of both employers and employees, and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment. The Commission needed to determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including provisions on wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment. The union raised concerns about the implications of certain clauses on employee rights and protections.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement, while generally favourable to both parties, contained provisions that did not meet the standard of fairness and reasonableness required by law. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that the rights and obligations of employees were adequately protected. After considering submissions from both parties and reviewing the provisions of the agreement, the Commission determined that the agreement, as proposed, did not meet the necessary standards and was not approved. The Commission directed the parties to return to negotiations to address the concerns raised.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.