| [2018] FWCA 3601 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Correct Care Australasia Pty Ltd
(AG2018/33)
CORRECT CARE AUSTRALASIA NURSES (VICTORIAN PRISONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2018 |
Application for approval of the Correct Care Australasia Nurses (Victorian Prisons) Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Correct Care Australasia Nurses (Victorian Prisons) Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Correct Care Australasia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 June 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428878 PR608250>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Correct Care Australasia Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3601
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3601
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it provided for the fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the nurses. The court needed to determine if the agreement met the requirements for procedural fairness, and if it provided for terms and conditions that were better off overall or at least no worse off for the employees compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement contained provisions that were necessary to prevent exploitation of the employees.
The court found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not comply with the Fair Work Act in several respects. It held that the agreement did not adequately protect the nurses' rights and interests, particularly in relation to certain working conditions and pay rates. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and that they did not exploit employees. As a result, the court refused to approve the proposed enterprise agreement. The court's decision highlighted the need for careful consideration of the terms and conditions of employment in enterprise agreements, and the importance of protecting the rights and interests of employees.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the proposed enterprise agreement be not approved, and directed the parties to further negotiate the terms and conditions of employment for the nurses. The court's decision emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and that they did not exploit employees. The outcome of the case highlighted the need for careful consideration of the terms and conditions of employment in enterprise agreements, and the importance of protecting the rights and interests of employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.