| [2024] FWCA 2744 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2024/2377)
COREX PLASTICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (EXTRUSION DIVISION) & UNITED WORKERS UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BELL | MELBOURNE, 26 JULY 2024 |
Application for approval of the Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2024 – s.218A variation to correct or amend obvious error.
Approval
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the employer Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 28 February 2024 and the Agreement was made on 21 June 2024. Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.[1]
The employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3), the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Correspondence was sent by my chambers to the employer raising potential concerns regarding patterns of work and their potential impact on the better off overall test (BOOT). One concern was in relation to non-successive afternoon / night shifts when compared to Award entitlements. The employer providing submissions, which I accept, that its night shift is permanent and operates in accordance with the relevant Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 (Award) provisions. Another concern was regarding part-time and casual employee day-shift workers on Sundays. The employer submitted, and I accept, that this pattern of work is more theoretical than reasonably foreseeable. It also noted the Extrusion department has never had a part-time or casual employee. A further concern was the non-provision in the Agreement of some allowances provided for under the Award. The employer submitted, and I accept, that no excluded allowance would arise under any reasonably foreseeable pattern of work or type of employment, and that other allowances are not applicable.
For each of the above matters, I am satisfied for the purpose of s.193A(6), and determine under s.193A(6A), of the Act, that the patterns of work described by the employer are the only patterns that are reasonably foreseeable as that is relevant for the better off overall test. No information to the contrary was indicated to chambers.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer. However, taking into account the factors in sections 186(3) and (3A), I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NOERR) was not in the prescribed form, as the pre-reform version has been used. It also contained additional content to prescribed form, including company letterhead, date and sign off. Nevertheless, in the circumstances, I am satisfied that this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(5) of the Act. Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188 of the Act.
The United Workers’ Union (UWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 26 July 2024 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 August 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.
Variation
The Agreement lodged appeared to contain an error in clause 1 of the Agreement regarding the Agreement title. Clause 1 provides that the Agreement will be known as the ‘Corex Plastics Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2022’. The Agreement title is otherwise referred to throughout the Agreement as “Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2024”.
Correspondence was sent to the parties to clarify that the reference to ‘2022’ in title clause 1 may be a mistake, and is intended to be a reference to ‘2024’ and further, that the Agreement title is intended to include the word ‘Australia’. I advised the parties that I intended to amend the clause on my own initiative pursuant to s.218A of the Act as an ‘obvious error’. The Parties were provided an opportunity to provide submissions if they disagreed with this proposed course of action. No objection was received to me amending the Agreement pursuant to s.218A.
I am satisfied the reference to ‘2022’ and non-inclusion of the word ‘Australia’ in clause 1 of the Agreement is an obvious error and should be corrected. The errors will be amended as per the order below.
Order
I order, pursuant to s.218A of the Act, that the Agreement be varied to correct an obvious error as follows:
- By deleting the reference to ‘Corex Plastics Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2022’ in clause 1 and replacing it with ‘Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2024’.
The variation will operate from 26 July 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act. Those changes broadly commenced operation on 6 June 2023, subject to various transitional arrangements which are not applicable to the present application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE525567 PR777550>
- AGLC
- Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 2744
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2744
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were primarily focused on whether the proposed variation to correct the error in the enterprise agreement was permissible under section 218A of the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether the variation would unfairly disadvantage any party. The court had to consider the specific nature of the error, the impact of the correction on the balance of the agreement, and whether the variation was necessary to achieve fairness and equity in the workplace. Additionally, the court examined whether the process for seeking and approving the variation was correctly followed.
In delivering its decision, the court found that the error in the enterprise agreement was indeed obvious and significant enough to warrant a variation under section 218A. The court held that the variation was necessary to correct the error and to ensure fairness and equity for both parties. The court noted that the process for seeking the variation was properly followed and that the proposed changes did not unfairly disadvantage either the employer or the employees. Consequently, the court approved the variation to the enterprise agreement, thereby correcting the error.
The final orders of the court were that the variation to the Corex Plastics Australia Pty Ltd (Extrusion Division) & United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2024 be approved to correct the identified error. This decision ensures that the enterprise agreement accurately reflects the intentions of the parties and provides a fair and equitable framework for the employment relationship.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.