[2016] FWCA 2380
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| CoreStaff WA Pty Ltd T/A Corestaff |
| (AG2016/549) |
CORESTAFF WA MINING INDUSTRY LABOUR HIRE ENTERPRISE
AGREEMENT 2016
Mining industry
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 14 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Corestaff WA Mining Industry Labour Hire Enterprise
Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Corestaff WA Mining Industry Labour Hire Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The
application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made
by Corestaff WA Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair
Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[2016] FWCA 2380
[4] The Agreement was approved on 14 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 21 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 April 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE418600 PR579093>
- AGLC
- CoreStaff WA Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2380
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2380
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the application met all the necessary requirements for approval under Sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act, and if the group of employees chosen for the agreement was fairly selected. Additionally, the court had to consider if the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 should be incorporated into the Agreement as per Section 205(2) of the Act.
The court found that the application met all the relevant requirements for approval. While the Agreement did not cover all employees of the employer, the court was satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen, taking into account the factors outlined in Sections 186(3) and (3A) of the Act. The court also determined that the model consultation term should indeed be a part of the Agreement. Consequently, the Agreement was approved, effective from 21 April 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 14 April 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.