| [2023] FWCA 135 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Corellian Pty Limited T/A Corellian Pty Ltd
(AG2022/5166)
CORELLIAN PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022 – 2026
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 16 JANUARY 2023 |
Application for variation of the Corellian Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022-2026
An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Corellian Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022-2026 (the Agreement). The application was made by Corellian Pty Limited T/A Corellian Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 9 September 2022. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 16 January 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517360 PR749670>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Corellian Pty Limited T/A Corellian Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 135
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 135
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed variations to the Enterprise Agreement were in compliance with the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the changes were necessary to accommodate a significant change in circumstances, whether the changes were fair and reasonable, and whether the application process had been conducted in good faith. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess whether the changes would result in employees being worse off overall.
In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions on the economic and operational context of the proposed changes. The Commission also considered the potential impact of the changes on employees, including any adverse effects on their conditions of employment. After careful consideration, the Commission found that the proposed variations did not meet the statutory criteria for a change to the Enterprise Agreement. The Commission held that the changes were not necessary to accommodate a significant change in circumstances, and that the application did not demonstrate that the changes were fair and reasonable. Furthermore, the Commission found that the application process had not been conducted in good faith, as it failed to adequately consider the interests of the employees.
The Commission dismissed the application for variation of the Enterprise Agreement. No further orders were made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.