DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.505 - Application to deal with a right of entry dispute

Cordina Foods Pty Ltd
v
The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union
(RE2018/668)

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 29 NOVEMBER 2018

Alleged dispute concerning the frequency with which a permit holder or permit holders of an organisation enter premises under s.484.

[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

[2] An Order [PR702753] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cordina Foods Pty Ltd took legal action against The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, alleging that union officials were entering their premises more frequently than permitted under section 484 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with determining the validity of these claims. The primary legal issue the court had to resolve was whether the frequency of union officials entering the premises exceeded the limits set by the legislation. This involved an examination of the terms of the permit and the actual occurrences as described by both parties.

The court considered the specific wording of section 484, which regulates the conditions under which union officials can enter premises for the purpose of engaging in union activities. It was essential to determine whether the actions of the union officials aligned with the legal standards provided by the Act. The court also needed to assess the evidence presented by both parties to establish a factual basis for the frequency of entries. This required a careful analysis of the documentation and testimonies provided to ascertain whether there had been a breach of the permit conditions.

In its decision, the court found that the union officials' actions did not exceed the permitted frequency as outlined in section 484 of the Act. The evidence presented by Cordina Foods Pty Ltd did not sufficiently demonstrate that the union officials had entered the premises more often than allowed by the permit. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, dismissing the claims made by Cordina Foods Pty Ltd. The court's decision was grounded in the understanding that the actions taken by the union officials were within the legal parameters set by the legislation.

Cordina Foods Pty Ltd v The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established