Cord and Cord

In *Cord and Cord*, the parties were engaged in proceedings before Cronin J. The dispute concerned the admissibility of evidence from a psychologist, Ms B, and a psychiatrist, Dr C.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the evidence proposed to be adduced from Ms B and Dr C was admissible in the proceedings.

Cronin J ruled that the evidence of Ms B and Dr C was inadmissible. The reasons for this ruling are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates the Court found the evidence did not meet the relevant legal tests for admissibility.

The Court ordered that the evidence of psychologist Ms B and psychiatrist Dr C be ruled inadmissible.