COPELAND & GROSSMANN

In the matter of Copeland & Grossmann, heard by Judge Roberts, the dispute concerned the division of property between the parties. The court was required to determine how the parties' various assets, including real estate, motor vehicles, and other chattels, should be distributed.

The court's reasoning focused on achieving an equitable distribution of the parties' property. This involved allocating specific assets and a portion of sale proceeds to each party. The orders reflect a division of both real property and personal possessions, with a clear directive on how jointly held funds were to be divided.

The court ordered that Ms. Grossmann transfer her interest in Property O to Mr. Copeland. Mr. Copeland was permitted to retain $102,115.00 from the proceeds of sale of Property S, with Ms. Grossmann to receive the remaining balance of those funds and all accrued interest. Further orders stipulated the transfer of various vehicles and chattels between the parties, with each party retaining other property in their possession.