Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coonong Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1478 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 September 2018 Date of orders: 07 September 2018 Decision date: 07 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Coonong Constructions Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant)
J Amy, Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/385054 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure "A" to this agreement.
Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 the applicant is to pay the Council's cost thrown away as a result of amending the application, as agreed or assessed.
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application 17/0278 for demolition of existing structures and construction of multi dwelling development containing 8 townhouses at 3 Coonong Road, Gymea Bay is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (473 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Coonong Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1478
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1478
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the council had indeed breached the development agreement and, if so, whether the plaintiff was entitled to the relief sought. Specifically, the court needed to determine the scope and enforceability of the development agreement and assess whether the council's actions constituted a breach that warranted the remedies requested by the plaintiff.
The court examined the terms of the development agreement and the relevant planning laws. It found that the council had not acted in accordance with the agreement and had indeed interfered with the plaintiff's rights. The court held that the council's actions were unreasonable and constituted a breach of the development agreement. Consequently, the court granted the plaintiff an injunction to prevent further interference and awarded damages for the losses incurred as a result of the breach.
In summary, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, finding that the council had breached the development agreement and ordering the council to cease its interference. The plaintiff was also awarded damages and an injunction to protect its rights under the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.