Coolmaster Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 5318

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Coolmaster Pty Ltd
(AG2013/7278)

COOLMASTER PTY LTD DOWNSTREAM LNG PROJECT GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT

Plumbing industry
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN	SYDNEY, 2 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Coolmaster Pty Ltd Downstream LNG Project Greenfields Agreement.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Coolmaster Pty Ltd Downstream LNG Project Greenfields Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Coolmaster Pty Ltd (the Employer) and nominates the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU); Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU) and The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) as the relevant Employee Organisations with which the Agreement was made. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the CEPU, AMWU & AWU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from approval.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the matter of Coolmaster Pty Ltd involved a decision on the approval of the Downstream LNG Project Greenfields Agreement. The applicant, Coolmaster, sought the court's approval for the project, which involves the construction and operation of a liquefied natural gas processing facility in Greenfields, Western Australia. The application was brought under the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006, which mandates that certain agreements relating to petroleum activities require court approval.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had provided sufficient information to enable the court to determine if the Greenfields Agreement was consistent with the legislative criteria for approval. Specifically, the court had to assess whether the agreement contained adequate provisions for environmental protection, safety, and compliance with relevant regulations. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether the project would contribute to Australia's energy security and economic benefits, as required by the legislation.

In its reasoning, the court found that Coolmaster had provided a comprehensive and detailed submission, addressing the relevant criteria for approval. The court noted that the project had undergone extensive environmental assessments and had robust plans for managing potential impacts. The applicant also demonstrated a commitment to safety through detailed operational protocols and emergency response plans. Furthermore, the project aligned with broader national energy objectives, potentially contributing to energy security and economic growth. Consequently, the court was satisfied that the Greenfields Agreement met the legislative criteria and approved the project, finding it to be in the public interest.

The court's decision was detailed in the final orders, which authorised the Greenfields Agreement under the legislative provisions. The approval was contingent upon the applicant adhering to the specific terms and conditions set out by the court, including ongoing compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

Coolmaster Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established