Construction Occupations Registrar v Bates (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] ACTCA 27
•17 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction Occupations Registrar v Bates (No 2) [2017] ACTCA 27
[2017] ACTCA 27
17 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal before the ACT Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (ACAT) concerned the interpretation of the *Building Act 2004* (ACT). The Construction Occupations Registrar, the appellant, sought costs against the unsuccessful respondent.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether there were sufficient reasons to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event, meaning the unsuccessful party should bear the costs of the successful party.
The Tribunal found that no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the respondent to justify deviating from the standard costs order. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether there were sufficient reasons to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event, meaning the unsuccessful party should bear the costs of the successful party.
The Tribunal found that no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the respondent to justify deviating from the standard costs order. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Construction Occupations Registrar v Bates
[2017] ACTCA 15
Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59
Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59