Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Lend Lease Building Pty Ltd (formerly known as Lend Lease Project Management and Construction Australia Pty Ltd)
Case
•
[2014] FWC 4032
•19 JUNE 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Lend Lease Building Pty Ltd (formerly known as Lend Lease Project Management and Construction Australia Pty Ltd) [2014] FWC 4032
[2014] FWC 4032
19 JUNE 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this case, the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) sought a declaration from the Fair Work Commission (FWC) that a dispute existed between the parties over any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES). Lend Lease Building Pty Ltd (Lend Lease) contested the CFMEU's claim. The FWC was tasked with determining whether a dispute existed under the specified terms.
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the CFMEU's application correctly identified a dispute as per the relevant legislation. Specifically, the court had to examine whether the CFMEU's application correctly identified a dispute that involved any matter arising under the enterprise agreement or the NES. The court also had to consider the procedural requirements and the proper interpretation of the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
The FWC held that the CFMEU's application did not correctly identify a dispute under the enterprise agreement or the NES. The court found that the CFMEU's application did not satisfy the requirements under section 186(6) of the Fair Work Act. The court noted that the application did not specify the matters in dispute or provide adequate details to meet the statutory criteria. Consequently, the FWC dismissed the CFMEU's application.
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the CFMEU's application correctly identified a dispute as per the relevant legislation. Specifically, the court had to examine whether the CFMEU's application correctly identified a dispute that involved any matter arising under the enterprise agreement or the NES. The court also had to consider the procedural requirements and the proper interpretation of the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
The FWC held that the CFMEU's application did not correctly identify a dispute under the enterprise agreement or the NES. The court found that the CFMEU's application did not satisfy the requirements under section 186(6) of the Fair Work Act. The court noted that the application did not specify the matters in dispute or provide adequate details to meet the statutory criteria. Consequently, the FWC dismissed the CFMEU's application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd T/A Laing O'Rourke v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWC 4050
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
DP World Brisbane Pty Ltd v The Maritime Union of Australia
[2013] FWCFB 8557
Finch v Telstra Super Pty Ltd
[2010] HCA 36