Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2012] FCA 45

6 February 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 45 [2012] FCA 45 6 February 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd was before the Court exercising jurisdiction under the Fair Work Act. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the National Employment Standards concerning the prohibition of cashing out paid personal/carer's leave. The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) alleged that Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd had contravened the standards by not providing a mechanism for cashing out such leave in accordance with modern award or enterprise agreement provisions. Additionally, the CFMEU sought a declaration that a clause in the individual agreement was invalid due to its contravention of the National Employment Standards.

The central legal issue for the Court was whether the individual agreement between the employer and employees provided for the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, thereby contravening the specified standards. Another issue was whether the individual agreement itself was contravened by such a provision. Furthermore, the Court needed to determine if a declaration should be made under the Fair Work Act, considering the employer's subsequent change of stance and intention to comply with the standards.

The Court found that the individual agreement did contain a provision relating to the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, which was invalidated by the National Employment Standards. However, the CFMEU did not succeed in obtaining the relief it sought, partly due to its failure to establish an actual contravention and partly due to the employer's change of mind, which rendered declaratory relief unnecessary. Given that the CFMEU did not obtain the relief sought, the Court held that there were no circumstances under which costs could be ordered against the CFMEU. The application was dismissed, and there was no order as to the costs of the proceeding.

ORDERS:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Employment & Labour Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • National Employment Standards

  • Individual Agreement

  • Declaratory Relief

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

24

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

3