Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2012] FCA 45
•6 February 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 45
[2012] FCA 45
6 February 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd was before the Court exercising jurisdiction under the Fair Work Act. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the National Employment Standards concerning the prohibition of cashing out paid personal/carer's leave. The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) alleged that Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd had contravened the standards by not providing a mechanism for cashing out such leave in accordance with modern award or enterprise agreement provisions. Additionally, the CFMEU sought a declaration that a clause in the individual agreement was invalid due to its contravention of the National Employment Standards.
The central legal issue for the Court was whether the individual agreement between the employer and employees provided for the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, thereby contravening the specified standards. Another issue was whether the individual agreement itself was contravened by such a provision. Furthermore, the Court needed to determine if a declaration should be made under the Fair Work Act, considering the employer's subsequent change of stance and intention to comply with the standards.
The Court found that the individual agreement did contain a provision relating to the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, which was invalidated by the National Employment Standards. However, the CFMEU did not succeed in obtaining the relief it sought, partly due to its failure to establish an actual contravention and partly due to the employer's change of mind, which rendered declaratory relief unnecessary. Given that the CFMEU did not obtain the relief sought, the Court held that there were no circumstances under which costs could be ordered against the CFMEU. The application was dismissed, and there was no order as to the costs of the proceeding.
ORDERS:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.
The central legal issue for the Court was whether the individual agreement between the employer and employees provided for the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, thereby contravening the specified standards. Another issue was whether the individual agreement itself was contravened by such a provision. Furthermore, the Court needed to determine if a declaration should be made under the Fair Work Act, considering the employer's subsequent change of stance and intention to comply with the standards.
The Court found that the individual agreement did contain a provision relating to the cashing out of paid personal/carer's leave, which was invalidated by the National Employment Standards. However, the CFMEU did not succeed in obtaining the relief it sought, partly due to its failure to establish an actual contravention and partly due to the employer's change of mind, which rendered declaratory relief unnecessary. Given that the CFMEU did not obtain the relief sought, the Court held that there were no circumstances under which costs could be ordered against the CFMEU. The application was dismissed, and there was no order as to the costs of the proceeding.
ORDERS:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
National Employment Standards
-
Individual Agreement
-
Declaratory Relief
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Jeld-Wen Glass Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 45
Most Recent Citation
Paper Australia Pty Ltd trading as Opal Australian Paper v Anthony May [2025] FWCFB 224
Cases Citing This Decision
24
Construction, Forestry, Maritime Mining and Energy Union v DP World (Fremantle) Limited
[2019] FCCA 2879
CEPU v BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited
[2013] FCCA 291
WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato
[2020] FCAFC 84
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
3