Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWC 1026


[2016] FWC 1026
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.448 - Application for revocation of protected action ballot order

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
v
Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd
(B2016/282)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 17 FEBRUARY 2016

Application to revoke order made in B2016/258.

[1] Pursuant to s.448 of the Fair Work Act 2009 and upon the application by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, the Order of the Fair Work Commission dated 9 February 2016 [PR576898] is hereby revoked.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR577111>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 1026
Case
[2016] FWC 1026
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to revoke an earlier order made in the matter of B2016/258. The dispute related to industrial action taken by the CFMEU against Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd. The FWC, acting under the Fair Work Act, considered the application and the legal issues presented by the parties.

The legal issues before the FWC included whether the CFMEU's industrial action was lawful and whether the earlier order made by the FWC was still appropriate in light of new information or changed circumstances. The FWC had to balance the rights of the union to engage in protected industrial action against the interests of the employer and the potential impact on the broader economy.

The FWC carefully examined the evidence and submissions from both parties, focusing on the nature and extent of the industrial action and its impact on the employer's business. The FWC concluded that the industrial action was lawful and that the earlier order should be maintained. The CFMEU's application to revoke the order was dismissed, and the FWC affirmed its earlier decision.

The FWC did not make any new orders but confirmed that the previous order remained in effect. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to the processes established under the Fair Work Act for resolving disputes related to industrial action. The FWC's careful consideration of the evidence and legal principles involved highlights its role in maintaining a fair and balanced approach to industrial disputes.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.