Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch
Case
•
[2017] FWC 5003
•2 OCTOBER 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch [2017] FWC 5003
[2017] FWC 5003
2 OCTOBER 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved an application for the issuance of a right of entry permit to Mr Rebel Brandon Hanlon by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Construction and General Division, New South Wales Divisional Branch. The application was made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, and the nature of the dispute centred around whether Mr Hanlon was a fit and proper person to hold such a permit. The case was heard by the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue the court had to determine was whether Mr Hanlon was suitable to be granted the right of entry permit. The application was based on the union's assertion that Mr Hanlon had the necessary qualifications, experience, and commitment to ensure the safety and health of workers in the construction, forestry, mining, and energy sectors. The court had to consider Mr Hanlon's background, his qualifications, and any relevant experience he possessed to assess his suitability for the role.
In its decision, the court examined the evidence provided by the union and Mr Hanlon. It found that Mr Hanlon had a solid background in occupational health and safety, with relevant qualifications and extensive experience in the sectors covered by the permit. The court was satisfied that Mr Hanlon demonstrated a high level of commitment to ensuring the safety and health of workers, which aligned with the objectives of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000. Based on this assessment, the court concluded that Mr Hanlon was a fit and proper person to hold the right of entry permit.
Accordingly, the court issued the permit to Mr Rebel Brandon Hanlon, recognising his qualifications and experience as sufficient to fulfil the responsibilities associated with the role. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that individuals granted such permits have the necessary expertise and dedication to promoting and maintaining occupational health and safety standards.
The primary legal issue the court had to determine was whether Mr Hanlon was suitable to be granted the right of entry permit. The application was based on the union's assertion that Mr Hanlon had the necessary qualifications, experience, and commitment to ensure the safety and health of workers in the construction, forestry, mining, and energy sectors. The court had to consider Mr Hanlon's background, his qualifications, and any relevant experience he possessed to assess his suitability for the role.
In its decision, the court examined the evidence provided by the union and Mr Hanlon. It found that Mr Hanlon had a solid background in occupational health and safety, with relevant qualifications and extensive experience in the sectors covered by the permit. The court was satisfied that Mr Hanlon demonstrated a high level of commitment to ensuring the safety and health of workers, which aligned with the objectives of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000. Based on this assessment, the court concluded that Mr Hanlon was a fit and proper person to hold the right of entry permit.
Accordingly, the court issued the permit to Mr Rebel Brandon Hanlon, recognising his qualifications and experience as sufficient to fulfil the responsibilities associated with the role. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that individuals granted such permits have the necessary expertise and dedication to promoting and maintaining occupational health and safety standards.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union for an entry permit for Joshua Thompson and Dylan Howard [2025] FWC 1177
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union for an entry permit for Joshua Thompson and Dylan Howard
[2025] FWC 1177
Construction, Forestry and Maritime, Employees Union
[2023] FWC 2873
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Maritime Union of Australia v Fair Work Commission
[2015] FCAFC 56
Re Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation
[2017] FWC 3282
Darlaston v Parker and Others
[2010] FCA 771