[2013] FWCA 4132 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division
(AG2013/6994)
SOUTHERN CROSS CRANES PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU MOBILE CRANE HIRING INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 26 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Southern Cross Cranes Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Mobile Crane Hiring Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Cross Cranes Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Mobile Crane Hiring Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE402016 PR538231>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division [2013] FWCA 4132
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4132
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The court had to determine whether the enterprise agreement complied with the legislative requirements, including whether it met the "better off overall test" and was made in good faith. The court also considered the procedural fairness and the appropriate standard of review for the approval process.
In its decision, the court held that the enterprise agreement did not meet the better off overall test as it did not provide for a sufficient increase in wages and conditions for the majority of employees. The court found that the agreement did not adequately address the needs of the employees and that the process for approval did not meet the standards of procedural fairness. The court also noted that the standard of review in such cases should be rigorous, given the significant implications for the parties involved. The application for approval was dismissed.
The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the enterprise agreement and the legislative framework. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide genuine benefits to employees and are made in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and good faith. The court's ruling highlights the stringent requirements for approving enterprise agreements and the necessity for careful consideration of employee interests in the negotiation and approval process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.