| [2016] FWCA 6890 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/5504)
FLOORING FUTURE PTY LTD T/A MACDONALD FLOORCOVERING GROUP AND CFMEU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 26 SEPTEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Flooring Future Pty Ltd t/a Macdonald Floorcovering Group and CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Flooring Future Pty Ltd t/a Macdonald Floorcovering Group and CFMEU Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 26 September 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 October 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE421314 PR585773>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 6890
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6890
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements and whether it contained provisions that were contrary to the public interest or that failed to protect employees' safety and health. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement appropriately balanced the rights of the employees with the legitimate needs of the employer. The union argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while Flooring Future Pty Ltd supported the union's position.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the agreement, found that it met the necessary legal standards and did not contain any provisions that undermined employee safety or health or that were contrary to the public interest. The Commission acknowledged the efforts of both parties in negotiating the agreement, which reflected a balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, recognising its compliance with the statutory requirements and its appropriateness for the industry and workforce involved.
No further orders were made beyond the approval of the enterprise agreement. The Commission's decision confirmed the agreement's validity, allowing it to be implemented and enforced between the union and the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.