| [2016] FWCA 6999 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/5873)
STILCON HIRE PTY LTD T/AS CRANE & ACCESS HIRE PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU MOBILE CRANE HIRING INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 29 SEPTEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Stilcon Hire Pty Ltd T/As Crane & Access Hire Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Mobile Crane Hiring Industry Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Stilcon Hire Pty Ltd T/As Crane & Access Hire Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Mobile Crane Hiring Industry Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 October 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE421392 PR585932>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 6999
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6999
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The commission examined the agreement in detail, considering its compliance with the Fair Work Act and its alignment with the principles of the industrial relations system. The court assessed the agreement's provisions concerning wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It was also essential to determine whether the agreement would promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. The commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met the criteria for approval. It was determined to be in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The commission approved the agreement, stating that it was fair and reasonable and would promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. The union and the employer could now implement the terms of the agreement, which would provide for the fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the employees. The court's decision was a significant step forward in ensuring that the employees had a fair and reasonable enterprise agreement that met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.