| [2016] FWCA 7959 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/6749)
TAURUS SCAFFOLD PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTION AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 4 NOVEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Taurus Scaffold Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collection Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Taurus Scaffold Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collection Agreement 2015 - 2019 (Agreement). The application was made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 November 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE422031 PR587203>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 7959
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 7959
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, whether it was made in good faith, and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements set forth in the Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the terms and conditions outlined in the relevant industrial instruments.
The Commission found that the agreement was indeed a genuine enterprise agreement that was made in good faith and complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. It was determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees as it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The Commission approved the agreement based on these findings, highlighting the satisfactory balance between the rights and interests of both the employer and the employees. The approval was granted on the condition that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.