| [2017] FWCA 1233 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/480)
ACUNZO, ANTONIO T/AS AVAME CAULKING AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 2 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the Acunzo, Antonio T/As Avame Caulking and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Acunzo, Antonio T/As Avame Caulking and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 2 March 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE423521 PR590677>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWCA 1233
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1233
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Commission was required to address involved determining whether the agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement, meaning that it provided employees with a minimum of the national safety net entitlements and was likely to provide them with a better overall package than the applicable award or registered agreement. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement adhered to the procedural requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act, such as providing adequate notice and opportunity for consultation and negotiation between the parties. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement included provisions that were contrary to public policy or which unfairly disadvantaged employees.
Upon reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement was indeed a BOOT agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided employees with improved terms and conditions compared to the applicable award or registered agreement, and therefore met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement adhered to the necessary procedural requirements, including providing adequate notice and opportunity for consultation and negotiation between the parties. Consequently, the Commission approved the proposed enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the Fair Work Commission included the approval of the Acunzo, Antonio T/As Avame Caulking and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018. The agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions of employment for workers within the business, was deemed to be a BOOT agreement and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The approval of this enterprise agreement will now serve as the basis for the employment relationship between the employer and the union's members for the duration of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.