| [2017] FWCA 1514 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/741)
TYSON HOFSTEE FAMILY TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS ABSOLUTE CAULKER AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SPECIALISED ROPE ACCESS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 16 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the Tyson Hofstee Family Trust (The Trustee for) T/As Absolute Caulker and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Specialised Rope Access Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tyson Hofstee Family Trust (The Trustee for) T/As Absolute Caulker and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Specialised Rope Access Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE423693 PR591046>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWCA 1514
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1514
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court centred on whether the proposed Enterprise Agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Court needed to determine if the Agreement was in the best interests of the employees, provided a safety net of minimum terms and conditions, and did not unfairly discriminate against any group of employees. The Court also considered whether the Agreement complied with the Good Faith Bargaining obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Court found that the proposed Enterprise Agreement met all the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Court concluded that the Agreement was in the best interests of the employees as it provided for a range of benefits, including salary increases, improved leave entitlements, and better working conditions. The Court also found that the Agreement provided a safety net of minimum terms and conditions and did not unfairly discriminate against any group of employees. The Court was satisfied that the Agreement was the product of good faith bargaining between the parties and that the parties had made a genuine attempt to reach an agreement. The Court approved the Enterprise Agreement, and it came into effect on 1 April 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.