| [2017] FWCA 1511 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/724)
TYSON HOFSTEE FAMILY TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS ABSOLUTE CAULKER AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 16 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the Tyson Hofstee Family Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Absolute Caulker and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tyson Hofstee Family Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Absolute Caulker and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE423690 PR591043>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWCA 1511
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1511
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the terms of the enterprise agreement were genuinely negotiated between the parties and whether any terms that were not genuinely negotiated were fair and reasonable. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the standard of being "better off, overall and in totality" for employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties. It noted that there had been a series of meetings between the union and the employer, and that the terms of the agreement reflected the outcomes of these discussions. The Commission also determined that the agreement met the standard of being better off, overall and in totality for employees, despite some provisions that were not genuinely negotiated. The Commission found that these provisions were fair and reasonable, taking into account the overall benefits of the agreement.
The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The modifications related to the calculation of overtime rates and the inclusion of a clause that allowed for the variation of the agreement by the parties. The modified agreement was deemed to be fair and reasonable, and met the standard of being better off, overall and in totality for employees. The parties were directed to implement the modified agreement and to take all necessary steps to give effect to its terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.