| [2017] FWCA 3709 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/2580)
CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION CLEANING PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 14 JULY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Corporate Construction Cleaning Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Corporate Construction Cleaning Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 July 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE424912 PR594552>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWCA 3709
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3709
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for determination were whether the collective agreement had been genuinely negotiated in good faith and whether the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable. The Commission needed to assess if the agreement met the criteria for approval as stipulated under the Fair Work Act, specifically considering the balance of power between the parties, the terms of the agreement, and whether it promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations.
The Full Bench found that the collective agreement had indeed been negotiated in good faith and contained terms that were fair and reasonable. The Commission noted the union's extensive efforts in negotiating the agreement, the comprehensive nature of the agreement, and the consideration given to the needs and interests of both the employer and the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement facilitated cooperative workplace relations and appropriately balanced the interests of both parties. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, ensuring its enforceability under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.