[2013] FWCA 102 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2012/14211)
MENTES SHOPFITTING TRUST T/AS MENTES SHOPFITTING PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU SHOP FITTING MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 9 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Mentes Shopfitting Trust T/As Mentes Shopfitting Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Shop Fitting Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mentes Shopfitting Trust T/As Mentes Shopfitting Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Shop Fitting Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2014.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899191 PR532931>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 102
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 102
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement contained all the required terms as outlined in the Fair Work Act, and if it was fairly and properly made. The court was required to examine whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it was free from any improper influences, and whether it provided for a genuine collective bargaining process. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a single, intelligible document, as required by the legislation.
In its reasoning, the court found that the agreement contained all the necessary terms as required by the Fair Work Act, including those concerning minimum wages, penalty rates, and other employment conditions. The court was satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith, without any improper influences, and that it represented a genuine collective bargaining process between the union and the employer. The court also confirmed that the agreement was a single, intelligible document that complied with the legislative requirements. Therefore, the court approved the application and ordered the registration of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.