[2013] FWCA 154 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2012/14454)
PHELAN CONSTRUCTIONS (AUSTRALIA) UNIT TRUST T/AS PHELAN CONSTRUCTIONS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (GIPPSLAND REGION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 9 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Phelan Constructions (Australia) Unit Trust T/As Phelan Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry (Gippsland Region) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Phelan Constructions (Australia) Unit Trust T/As Phelan Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry (Gippsland Region) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE899237 PR532988>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 154
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 154
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the nature and content of the terms in question, assessing whether they had the effect of preventing the employer from engaging labour on a casual basis, and whether they imposed an unreasonable restriction on the employer's ability to conduct its business. The Commission concluded that the terms did not contravene public policy, as they did not prevent the employer from engaging labour on a casual basis or impose an unreasonable restriction on the employer's business operations. The Commission found that the terms were necessary to ensure that employees were not subjected to unfair work practices and were reasonable in the circumstances. The application for approval of the enterprise agreement was accordingly granted. As a result, the agreement was approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.