[2013] FWCA 1920 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/577)
PKF QUEENSLAND PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 2 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the PKF Queensland Pty Ltd and CFMEU union collective agreement 2012-2016.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 12 March 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the PKF Queensland Pty Ltd and CFMEU union collective agreement 2012-2016 (“the Agreement”).
[2] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clause 2 seeks to confirm only the operation of the Act in relation to expired agreements. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that nothing further is intended by the clause.
- Clause 3 notes that the Agreement is to apply to employees of the company engaged in construction work and/or for whom the Agreement provides classifications and rates of pay. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that this “and/or” should be read as “and”.
- Clauses 31.4 and 31.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 39 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 39 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 31.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 31.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[1] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE400510 PR535236>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 1920
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1920
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were centred around the interpretation and application of industrial laws and regulations to the collective agreement in question. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the provisions of the agreement were consistent with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether they complied with any relevant codes of practice or industry standards. The court was also required to consider whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both the employer and the employees.
The court considered the arguments of both parties and examined the provisions of the agreement in detail. It found that while some provisions of the agreement were not in compliance with the relevant laws and regulations, others were acceptable. The court also found that the agreement as a whole was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both the employer and the employees. The court therefore approved the agreement subject to certain modifications to bring it into compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. The final orders of the court required PKF Queensland Pty Ltd to implement the modified agreement and for the CFMEU to take steps to ensure that its members were aware of the changes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.