[2013] FWCA 2505 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/6083)
STRACHAN FAMILY TRUST (TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS TOTAL WINDOW SERVICES PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 24 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Strachan Family Trust (Trustee for) T/As Total Window Services Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Strachan Family Trust (Trustee for) T/As Total Window Services Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE400927 PR535966>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 2505
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2505
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the enterprise agreement was in the best interests of the small business and its employees. The Trust argued that the agreement would increase its costs and reduce its competitiveness, while the CFMEU maintained that the agreement provided appropriate protections and benefits for employees. The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties, including the size and nature of the business, the impact of the agreement on the business's operations, and the bargaining power of the parties.
After considering the evidence, the Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was in the best interests of the small business and its employees. The Commission found that the agreement provided appropriate protections and benefits for employees, and that the impact on the business's operations was not significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the agreement. The Commission also found that the bargaining power of the parties was not significantly imbalanced, and that the agreement was not unfairly prejudicial to the small business.
The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain modifications to address the concerns of the small business. The CFMEU and the Trust were required to implement the modified agreement, and the Commission monitored its operation to ensure compliance. The decision provides guidance on the factors that the Commission considers when assessing the appropriateness of an enterprise agreement for a small business.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.